Tell us how you trade and we'll point you to the right research segment.
Talk to Our Team →Start with our beginner-friendly guides on market basics, order types, and risk management before you place your first trade.
Start Learning → Browse All Articles →Intraday tips for trading around news events start from a different premise than most day-to-day intraday trading: the question is not what the index will do, since that is genuinely unknowable ahead of a scheduled release, but how the mechanics of the market change in the minutes before, during and after that release, and how a trader should adjust behaviour to account for those mechanics. Scheduled data releases, policy announcements and corporate results all share a common structural feature — a short window in which liquidity, spreads and volatility behave very differently from an ordinary session — and trading well around them is largely about respecting that structural shift rather than trying to out-guess the headline. This piece works through what actually changes around a scheduled event, the specific risks that trip traders up, and a practical framework for deciding whether to participate at all.
Every Section
Every Idea
Takeaways
The defining feature of a scheduled news event is not the news itself but the collapse in normal market behaviour that surrounds it. In the minutes immediately before a widely anticipated release, many participants deliberately step back from providing liquidity, since quoting a firm price ahead of unknown information carries obvious risk for whoever is on the other side of that quote.
This withdrawal of liquidity is the mechanical root of almost everything else that follows. With fewer participants willing to trade at tight prices, the gap between the best available buy and sell price widens, and the size available at each price level thins out. A market that felt orderly minutes earlier can become genuinely difficult to transact in cleanly, independent of what the news itself eventually says.
Once the release lands, the combination of thin liquidity and a rush of participants trying to react simultaneously tends to produce an initial move that overshoots whatever the market eventually settles on as a fair read of the news. This first, reflexive move is frequently unwound, partially or fully, within the following minutes as liquidity returns and the information gets digested more carefully. Treating the very first tick of reaction as the definitive read is one of the more reliable ways to be caught on the wrong side of that unwind.
A wider spread is not simply a minor inconvenience; it is a direct, immediate cost paid on entry and again on exit, and around a genuinely high-impact event that cost can be considerably larger than it is during an ordinary session. This cost applies regardless of whether the eventual directional call turns out to be correct.
This matters more for strategies that depend on frequent entries and exits than for a single well-timed position, since the widened-spread cost is paid on every transaction. A trader accustomed to a certain cost of entry during calm conditions and carrying that same expectation into an event window is often surprised by how much more expensive the same size of position has become to execute cleanly.
There is also a less visible cost sitting alongside the spread itself: the size available at the best price thins out at exactly the same moment the spread is widening, which means a larger order may not fill at a single price at all but instead walk through several progressively worse levels before it is complete. A trader judging execution cost purely by the quoted spread, without accounting for how little size actually sits behind that quote, can end up with a considerably worse average fill than the visible spread alone would have suggested.
The most consequential decision around a scheduled release is often made well before it happens: whether to be carrying a position into the event at all. Holding an existing position through a known, high-impact release means accepting exposure to a move whose size and direction cannot be reasonably estimated in advance, which is a fundamentally different kind of risk from the exposure a trader signed up for when the position was originally opened.
Flattening a position ahead of a known event, or reducing its size meaningfully, is not a concession that the original view was wrong. It is a recognition that the risk profile of holding through the event is different in kind from the risk profile the position was designed around, and that the two deserve to be evaluated separately rather than treated as a single continuous decision.
There are cases where remaining in a position through a scheduled event is a deliberate, considered choice rather than an oversight — most often when the position was already sized small enough that the widened range of possible outcomes remains within an acceptable loss, and when the trader has a specific, considered view on how the event is likely to interact with the existing thesis. The distinction that matters is whether the decision was made consciously in advance or simply happened by default because the position was never revisited before the release.
A more defensible approach for many intraday traders is not attempting to predict the content of the release at all, but instead waiting for the release to occur and then reading the market’s actual reaction to it, entering only once liquidity has begun to normalise and a genuine directional character has established itself.
This approach deliberately gives up the possibility of catching the very first, largest part of a move in exchange for avoiding the widest-spread, thinnest-liquidity window where execution is least reliable and reversal risk is highest. For most intraday traders without a specific structural edge in that first window, this trade-off favours patience.
Implied volatility in the options market, along with the general tenor of pre-event commentary, tends to rise ahead of a widely anticipated release as the market prices in the possibility of a large move. This rise is itself useful information, separate from whatever the release eventually says, since it gives a rough sense of how large a reaction the market is collectively bracing for.
A release that the market had priced as high-impact but that turns out to be a non-event in practice often produces a distinctive settling pattern — a brief volatility spike on the release itself followed by a fairly quick collapse back toward pre-event levels, as the priced-in uncertainty resolves without the large move the market had been bracing for. Recognising this pattern helps avoid chasing a move that is already exhausting itself by the time it becomes visible on a chart.
A simple, repeatable routine tends to serve better than reacting freshly to each event as it arrives. Knowing in advance which scheduled releases fall within a session, deciding ahead of time whether existing positions will be reduced or held through them, and having a clear rule for how long to wait after a release before considering a fresh entry all remove decisions that are otherwise made under pressure, in the moment, with the least reliable information available.
This kind of preparation also protects against a subtler failure mode: making no decision at all and simply being caught holding whatever position happened to exist when the release landed. A checklist reviewed the evening before or the morning of a session with known events converts an emotional, reactive decision into a routine, considered one, made with a clear head well before the pressure of the actual moment arrives.
Keeping a short written note after each event-driven session — what was decided in advance, whether that decision was followed, and how the actual outcome compared with the plan — builds a genuinely useful record over time. It is easy to remember the sessions where ignoring the plan happened to work out and to quietly forget the ones where it did not, and a written record removes that selective memory from the equation, giving a far more honest picture of whether the routine itself is actually adding value.
An ordinary intraday session rewards reading structure, momentum and levels as they develop continuously through the day. An event-driven window compresses a large amount of that same kind of information into a very short period, which changes the nature of the skill required — less about reading a gradually forming pattern and more about managing execution risk and position size through a burst of genuine uncertainty.
Recognising which kind of session is actually in play, and adjusting expectations and behaviour accordingly rather than applying one fixed approach regardless of context, is itself one of the more practical distinctions separating a considered intraday process from one that simply reacts to whatever the market happens to be doing at any given moment.
A useful habit is checking the calendar of scheduled releases at the start of the day, alongside the ordinary levels and structure that would normally be prepared, so the session’s character is anticipated rather than discovered midway through. A trader who only realises a high-impact release is imminent once the market has already started reacting to it has lost the single advantage that scheduled events actually offer over ordinary volatility — the fact that the timing, at least, was known well in advance.
Not always, but it should always be a deliberate decision rather than something left to default. Reducing or closing a position ahead of a high-impact event is often reasonable, but a considered choice to remain in a smaller, well-sized position can also be reasonable when the risk has genuinely been weighed in advance.
Thin liquidity and a rush of simultaneous reactions frequently produce an initial overshoot that gets partially unwound as liquidity returns and the market has more time to digest the information carefully, rather than reacting to the headline alone.
The exact amount varies by event and by how anticipated it was, but the direction is consistent — spreads widen meaningfully as liquidity providers step back ahead of unknown information, and that widening is a real, immediate cost worth accounting for in position sizing.
For most intraday traders without a specific edge in predicting the release itself, waiting for the reaction and letting liquidity normalise before entering tends to be the more defensible approach, since it avoids the widest-spread, least-reliable execution window.
Explore our Nifty Tips Provider service or get in touch with our research team.